Tuesday, January 7, 2014

All Dried Up And No Place To Go

The once mighty Colorado River is nothing more than a muddy stream these days as millions of folks in southwestern states depend on it for drinking water.  But climate change and population growth have put a critical strain on the river, and water rights are turning into the next great battleground between the states.

The once broad and blue river has in many places dwindled to a murky brown trickle. Reservoirs have shrunk to less than half their capacities, the canyon walls around them ringed with white mineral deposits where water once lapped. Seeking to stretch their allotments of the river, regional water agencies are recycling sewage effluent, offering rebates to tear up grass lawns and subsidizing less thirsty appliances from dishwashers to shower heads. 
But many experts believe the current drought is only the harbinger of a new, drier era in which the Colorado’s flow will be substantially and permanently diminished. 
Faced with the shortage, federal authorities this year will for the first time decrease the amount of water that flows into Lake Mead, the nation’s largest reservoir, from Lake Powell 180 miles upstream. That will reduce even more the level of Lake Mead, a crucial source of water for cities from Las Vegas to Los Angeles and for millions of acres of farmland.

Permanent water rationing by the end of the decade in states like California, Nevada, and Arizona seems inevitable.  That would affect tens of millions of Americans, and require millions, if not billions in new water infrastructure.  Think climate change might be expensive?

Reclamation officials say there is a 50-50 chance that by 2015, Lake Mead’s water will be rationed to states downstream. That, too, has never happened before.

If Lake Mead goes below elevation 1,000” — 1,000 feet above sea level — “we lose any capacity to pump water to serve the municipal needs of seven in 10 people in the state of Nevada,” said John Entsminger, the senior deputy general manager of the Southern Nevada Water Authority.

That seems like a problem, don't you think?  Water rights fights will be the interstate commerce of the future:

The labyrinthine rules by which the seven Colorado states share the river’s water are rife with potential points of conflict. And while some states have made huge strides in conserving water — and even reducing the amount they consume — they have yet to chart a united path through shortages that could last years or even decades.
“There is no planning for a continuation of the drought we’ve had,” said one expert on the Colorado’s woes, who asked not to be identified to preserve his relationship with state officials. “There’s always been within the current planning an embedded hope that somehow, things would return to something more like normal.”

Massive drought fueled by climate change is the new "normal".  Maybe when enough red states in the Mountain West and Midwest are suffering from crippling drought, the GOP legislatures that run them will do something, especially when food prices shoot up across the country as farmland bakes in the sun with no irrigation.

Of course by then, it will probably be far too late.




3 comments:

David Atkins said...

We would all be better off today if our forebears had listened to Colonel Powell, when he mapped the rivers of the West and recommended that the political boundaries in the dry lands be concordant with the major watersheds. This business of having seven states divvy up the water rights to the Colorado is absurd.


As a specific case that is near and dear to my heart, the good farmers of Iowa grow world class alfalfa using the rain that God gave them. In Utah, twenty years ago when I lived out that way, the good farmers grew world class alfalfa out in the desert using heavily subsidized water from the federal projects - even though the Iowa farmers were practically giving away their product. That seems to me a howlingly insane misallocation of resources, driven solely by political considerations. The fact that the Utah farmers were, to a man, staunch anti-government Republicans only heightens the contradictions.

RepubAnon said...

When the Western red states are suffering from crippling droughts, and the coastal red states are being flooded by record high tides, their Republican legislatures will deal with the problem - by blaming liberals and environmentalists. Democrats look for solutions, Republicans look for scapegoats.

Horace Boothroyd III said...

IT'S ALL YOUR FAULT! WHY DIDN'T YOU PUSH HARDER FOR REGULATIONS WHEN YOU HAD THE CHANCE!


I can hear the goopers howl already.

Related Posts with Thumbnails