Wednesday, November 10, 2010

Decision Points, Or How I Learned To Stop Thinking And Set Up Us The Bomb

As I said, I wouldn't use George W. Bush's new memoir for a coaster because it might ruin my drink.  The absolute best review of the (big air quotes) "book" is from the Independent's Matthew Norman.

The reduction of Bush's two terms to a satirical sequel to one of those US prep school movies in which the smirking, idiot boy breaks the honour code but is rescued by his Brahmin dad had come to seem shamefully hackneyed. But the one cliché worth trotting out here is that clichés are clichés because they are true. Somehow this half-witted frat boy journeyed, via some jovially preposterous sequence of events involving failed oil deals and baseball team franchises, from japes with Alpha Sigma Phi to possession of the nuclear codes. 

Nothing, not even W himself, is ever quite that simple, and palpably there was an edge of madness in the family. In his teens, when his mother Barbara had a miscarriage, he relates, he drove her to the hospital. "I never expected to see the remains of the foetus," he recalls, "which she had saved in a jar to bring to the hospital. I remember thinking there was a human life, a little brother or sister." Enough in that alone, to drive any adolescent to drink, you'd have guessed, yet the tale is told as a homily to his mother's wisdom, and in some impenetrable way to justify his pro-life, anti-stem cell research hard line.

Almost every sentence in the Times extraction (and it does feel like having a tooth pulled) invokes a fatigued he-just-doesn't-get-it. Churchill is inevitably adduced, while W bangs on about his passion for reading history. Inevitably, he fails to make the connection. 

"Study history, study history. In history lies all the secrets of statecraft," urged Winston, and while Bush did little as president other than read history books, the stagecraft entirely eluded him. Some of those tomes must have dealt with the British and Soviet experiences of invading Afghanistan, and not a word sunk in. I know how that feels from a tussle with A Brief History of Time. The difference is that I didn't extrapolate my failure to grasp a syllable into a bold attempt to rewrite the laws of quantum physics. He assumed he could rewrite the laws of geopolitics.

The process of historical revisionism has, like everything else, speeded alarmingly in the internet age. The emergence of Sarah Palin as an imaginable presidential candidate, allied to the unending travails of Obama, have induced in the amnesiac, the obtuse and the plain bananas a fondness for the memory of George W Bush.

A President designed for the 24-hour news cycle meant America got exactly what it deserved, and as a result the lesson we learned after discovering two years wasn't enough to clean up his mess is that we've decided as a people that Bush's main problem was that he wasn't insane enough, so we need the Tea Party.

The absurdity is glorious in all its garish vulgarity.  I often wonder if the rest of the world laughs at us, and then I realize that these days they look at us like a junkyard dog that needs to be put down, and nobody really wants to do it.  

Bush is, for all his faults, quintessentially American. And that should scare the crap out of you.

(h/t Balloon Juice)

2 comments:

SteveAR said...

FTA (emphasis mine):

Somehow this half-witted frat boy journeyed, via some jovially preposterous sequence of events involving failed oil deals and baseball team franchises, from japes with Alpha Sigma Phi to possession of the nuclear codes.

As opposed to "super-genius" Obama and his administration full of more "super-geniuses", right? Take a look at how the "super-genius" runs the government.

SteveASS said...

why do you keep coming here and posting links to your shit-headed blog? is arguing with people the only way you can validate yourself? you aren't going to change anybody's mind about anything here and vice-versa. what a blithering numbskull you must be.

Related Posts with Thumbnails