Tuesday, August 17, 2010

Another Milepost On The Road To Oblivion

When people like CNN's Jack Cafferty are asking questions like this:
Are Muslims buying themselves unnecessary problems by insisting on building a mosque near Ground Zero in New York?
...then we as a people have forgotten almost everything about civil rights and freedoms.  How many times, how many ways can we tell a minority group of Americans "don't rock the boat or you'll sink"?  I understand there's a long journey for any minority group in America to get to acceptable status, but even then "acceptable" status always has to be fought for...by rocking the boat.

You're too close to the front of the bus. You're too close to the front of the lunch counter. You're too close to that water fountain and that bathroom. You're too close to Ground Zero.

Don't go borrowing trouble.

Yeah, American history is full of advancing civil rights by accepting separate but equal status and not "buying unnecessary problems".

[UPDATE]: From Waffles in the comments:

There not saying "You cannot build the mosque at all"

You're stretching badly.

Really.  Nobody, huh.



GUPTA: Thank you. I want to be clear on your viewpoint here because you've made quite a bit of waves lately. You don't want any mosques built in the United States, is that correct? You want a moratorium?

FISCHER: I think the reality Dr. Gupta is, that when we look at Islam, we're looking at a totalitarian ideology that is anti-Christian, anti-Semitic. The values that are at the core of Islam are contrary to every single solitary western and American value. I think communities ought to have the liberty to reject building permits.

Each one of these mosques is either a potential or actual recruitment center for Jihadism or training center for Jihadism.

GUPTA: You said quite a bit there already. Let me just start with one thing, freedom of religion. You've been asked this question before; it's one of this country's founding principles.

The First Amendment says, Congress shall make no law respecting (ph) an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.

How can you say that that potentially applies to all religions except Islam?

FISCHER: Well, the reality, Dr. Gupta, is that no one could claim First Amendment religious protections if their ideology and their activities are subversive.

All you've got do is ask the Christian militia, the Hutaree how much First Amendment protections they had when they set out to attack federal officers. They have Bible verses plastered all over their Web site. Everything they did, they did in the name of Jesus Christ. They are right now pondering the limits of the First Amendment from the inside of a jail cell, which is where they should be.

But of course, Fischer sees this as evidence that Islam is subversive, not Christianity, because of course Hutaree didn't represent Christianity, but 9/11 represented every single Muslim.  These assholes don't give a damn about the Constitution.  They just hate Muslims, period.

7 comments:

In Ur Blog Eatin Waffles (Accept no fail imitations) said...

There not saying "You cannot build the mosque at all"

You're stretching badly.

Zandar said...

You can sit on the bus. You have that right, it's public transportation and you're an American. You just should sit at the back of the bus as not to offend anyone.

You can build Cordoba House. You have that right, it's a place of worship and you're Americans. You should just build it farther away as not to offend anyone.

Zandar said...

And for the record, the American Family Association is not only saying Cordoba House should not be built anywhere in America, but that no more mosques should be, period.

In Ur Blog Eatin Waffles (Accept no fail imitations) said...

Should've been more specific, referring to those like Harry Reid who have come out against this. There are plenty of crazies on both sides who will be for and against.

I for one can say I actually agree with Harry. I never thought I would be uttering those words but hey it's Obama's America, I believe in change :-)

In Ur Blog Eatin Waffles (Accept no fail imitations) said...

Also this is similar to the gay marriage ban in California, the many are trying to make a decision for the few. In this case it's people do not want this by Ground Zero. I don't think it would be as big of an issue if Faisal Abdul Rauf were not involved.

SteveARSE said...

like i needed more proof that harry reid is a douchebag: wafflez agrees with him about something! ugh.

In Ur Blog Eatin Waffles (Accept no fail imitations) said...

But he's your liberal wet dream!

Or is that Nancy?

Related Posts with Thumbnails